| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs A6 9210


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 20.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
670f00
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/2
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2013
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
27.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
4.87k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
10.38k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
2.59k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.38k (x0.55)
TOTAL
31.6k
20.22k (x0.64)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
7.41k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
11.87k (x0.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
3.35k (x0.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
2.6k (x0.23)
TOTAL
536.99k
25.23k (x0.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
4.71k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
11.03k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.59k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
2.45k (x0.67)
TOTAL
28.23k
20.78k (x0.74)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
8.43k (x0.04)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
12.8k (x0.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
3.32k (x0.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
2.59k (x0.3)
TOTAL
551.1k
27.13k (x0.05)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1809 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4