| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1501.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.7 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
b0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10 /20
24/32
TDP
115 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
1763.08k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
31.93k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
31.54k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
18.8k (x4.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
20.82k (x4.83)
TOTAL
31.6k
103.09k (x3.26)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
522.07k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
584.17k (x2.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
344.38k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
25.36k (x2.21)
TOTAL
536.99k
1475.97k (x2.75)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
31.8k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
32.83k (x3.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
18.37k (x4.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
21.13k (x5.77)
TOTAL
28.23k
104.13k (x3.69)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
532.97k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
596.78k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
342.96k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
28.6k (x3.27)
TOTAL
551.1k
1501.31k (x2.72)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
4774 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
2744 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
12011 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
5483 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5660 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
3166 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
3644 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
17953 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4