| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i7-13700HX


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 836.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
b06f2
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
10 /20
16/24
TDP
115 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
27.23k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
27.1k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
15.65k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
15.52k (x4.24)
TOTAL
28.23k
85.5k (x3.03)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
277.49k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
360.68k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
173.57k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
25.19k (x2.88)
TOTAL
551.1k
836.93k (x1.52)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
5045 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
6558 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
3156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
458 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
15217 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
5446 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5420 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
3130 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
17101 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4