| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 421.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
90675
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10 /20
6/12
TDP
115 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
399.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
24.18k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
23.85k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
14.42k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
14.87k (x3.45)
TOTAL
31.6k
77.32k (x2.45)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
122.98k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
168.77k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
96.11k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
16.32k (x1.43)
TOTAL
536.99k
404.19k (x0.75)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
24.24k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
24.74k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
13.95k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
14.47k (x3.95)
TOTAL
28.23k
77.41k (x2.74)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
126.87k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
186.48k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
92.37k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
15.45k (x1.76)
TOTAL
551.1k
421.18k (x0.76)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1084 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
1594 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
790 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
132 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
3600 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
5509 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5624 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
3290 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
17592 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4