| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/8
TDP
115 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
210.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
14.48k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
24.18k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
11.95k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
11.01k (x2.56)
TOTAL
31.6k
61.62k (x1.95)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
50.98k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
80.7k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
36.61k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
12.02k (x1.05)
TOTAL
536.99k
180.32k (x0.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
16.27k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
25.74k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.5k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
10.82k (x2.96)
TOTAL
28.23k
64.32k (x2.28)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
54k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
88.76k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
35.23k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
12.14k (x1.39)
TOTAL
551.1k
190.12k (x0.34)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
6790 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4