Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f82
Core
Haswell-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.25k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
19.72k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
5.84k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
21.36k (x6.82)
TOTAL
18.17k
51.17k (x2.82)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
35.04k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
181.42k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
64.86k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
8.21k (x0.86)
TOTAL
182.59k
289.54k (x1.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
15.22k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
24.12k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.87k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
21k (x6.4)
TOTAL
27.11k
66.21k (x2.44)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
126.81k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
229.86k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
61.74k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
9.77k (x1.47)
TOTAL
325.78k
428.19k (x1.31)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
14.44k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.92k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.8k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
19.07k (x6.11)
TOTAL
27.57k
64.24k (x2.33)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
122.01k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
220.34k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
59.89k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
9.9k (x1.47)
TOTAL
338.73k
412.13k (x1.22)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
15.34k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
25.75k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.79k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
17.95k (x5.51)
TOTAL
36.41k
64.83k (x1.78)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
123.07k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
239.3k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
60.6k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
8.18k (x1.22)
TOTAL
452.9k
431.14k (x0.95)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4