Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-1660 v4
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
406f1
Core
Haswell-EP
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
320.49k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
12.41k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
17.23k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.89k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.07k (x0.8)
TOTAL
33.68k
37.6k (x1.12)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
102.11k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
156.5k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
42.08k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
19.8k (x1.12)
TOTAL
277.66k
320.49k (x1.15)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
781 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
330 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
2057 points/W
2289 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3309 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1342 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
9354 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4