Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
50657
Core
Haswell-EP
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
135 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
12.92k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
10.97k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.54k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.09k (x1.36)
TOTAL
41.36k
31.52k (x0.76)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
103.33k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
87.67k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
20.1k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
4.91k (x0.29)
TOTAL
343.64k
216.02k (x0.63)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4