Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306e4
Core
Haswell-EP
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
11.85k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
11.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.69k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.12k (x1.07)
TOTAL
33.68k
32.49k (x0.96)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
47.65k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
54.81k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
21.56k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
10.05k (x0.57)
TOTAL
277.66k
134.08k (x0.48)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
781 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
330 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
2057 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3309 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1342 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
9354 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4