Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-3340M
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 277.7 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306a9
Core
Haswell-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /2
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
11.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
11.13k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.4k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.55k (x1.19)
TOTAL
33.68k
31.58k (x0.94)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
22.59k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
25.49k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
10.42k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
4.25k (x0.24)
TOTAL
277.66k
62.75k (x0.23)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
781 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
330 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2057 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3309 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1342 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
9354 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4