Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
26.37k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
23.91k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.57k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
11.68k (x3.11)
TOTAL
41.36k
67.53k (x1.63)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
114.08k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
114.71k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
27.33k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
4.25k (x0.25)
TOTAL
343.64k
260.38k (x0.76)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4