| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906eb
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
192.88k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
13.6k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
20.58k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8.8k (x2.29)
TOTAL
33.68k
47.74k (x1.42)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
50.18k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
75.99k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
17.66k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
4.12k (x0.23)
TOTAL
277.66k
147.95k (x0.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
24.89k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
21.82k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.83k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
8.63k (x2.3)
TOTAL
41.36k
60.16k (x1.45)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
89.4k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
81.19k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
18.06k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
4.24k (x0.25)
TOTAL
343.64k
192.88k (x0.56)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4