| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i3-6100U


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.9 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
406e3
Core
Haswell-EP
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
69.94k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
8.06k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
12.85k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
3.14k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.01k (x1.04)
TOTAL
33.68k
28.06k (x0.83)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
16.58k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
28.88k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
7.38k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
3.82k (x0.22)
TOTAL
277.66k
56.66k (x0.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
12.55k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
12.19k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.81k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.18k (x0.85)
TOTAL
41.36k
30.73k (x0.74)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
29.33k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
28.81k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
6.46k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
5.33k (x0.32)
TOTAL
343.64k
69.94k (x0.2)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1956 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
431 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
356 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
4663 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5459 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
13362 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4