| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806d0
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
709.85k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
17.25k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
25.53k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
12.56k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
11.4k (x2.97)
TOTAL
33.68k
66.74k (x1.98)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
144.5k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
243.41k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
109.02k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
16k (x0.9)
TOTAL
277.66k
512.94k (x1.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
30.84k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
26.38k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.66k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
11.74k (x3.13)
TOTAL
41.36k
81.62k (x1.97)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
294.86k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
280.92k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
113.9k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
20.16k (x1.19)
TOTAL
343.64k
709.85k (x2.07)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4