Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a70f41
Core
Haswell-EP
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
31.57k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
25.2k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.42k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
21.93k (x5.84)
TOTAL
41.36k
91.11k (x2.2)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
265.26k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
226.13k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
114.46k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
16.49k (x0.97)
TOTAL
343.64k
622.34k (x1.81)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4