Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a40f41
Core
Haswell-EP
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
21.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
22.41k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
10.21k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
24.27k (x6.46)
TOTAL
41.36k
77.93k (x1.88)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
158.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
215.86k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
89.45k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
14.77k (x0.87)
TOTAL
343.64k
478.73k (x1.39)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4