| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f11
Core
Haswell-EP
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
135 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
410.47k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
15.11k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
23.46k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.64k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
17.52k (x4.57)
TOTAL
33.68k
61.72k (x1.83)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
119.5k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
198.79k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
59.75k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
11.58k (x0.65)
TOTAL
277.66k
389.62k (x1.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
15.02k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
24.26k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.53k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
16.26k (x4.33)
TOTAL
41.36k
61.07k (x1.48)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
122.92k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
220.32k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
59.78k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
7.44k (x0.44)
TOTAL
343.64k
410.47k (x1.19)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4