Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.7 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.7 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
13.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
22.35k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.37k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.4k (x0.89)
TOTAL
33.68k
44.15k (x1.31)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
56.49k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
100.74k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
28.21k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
3.04k (x0.17)
TOTAL
277.66k
188.49k (x0.68)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
14.2k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
23.23k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.35k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.18k (x1.38)
TOTAL
41.36k
47.96k (x1.16)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
58.24k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
105.72k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
28.73k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
5.59k (x0.33)
TOTAL
343.64k
198.27k (x0.58)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4