| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
71.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
11.54k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
19.69k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.55k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.25k (x0.85)
TOTAL
33.68k
39.03k (x1.16)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
19.25k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
36.27k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
10.2k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
3.07k (x0.17)
TOTAL
277.66k
68.8k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
10.73k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
18.15k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.99k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.89k (x1.04)
TOTAL
41.36k
36.77k (x0.89)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
20.11k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
36.87k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
10.74k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
3.31k (x0.2)
TOTAL
343.64k
71.02k (x0.21)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4