Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs A10 9630P
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 10.4 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 10.4 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
660f51
Core
Haswell-EP
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
8.52k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
11.04k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.36k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
1.79k (x0.48)
TOTAL
41.36k
23.7k (x0.57)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
12.83k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
14.44k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
3.6k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
2.05k (x0.12)
TOTAL
343.64k
32.92k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
732 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4