| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
135 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
53.69k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
28.76k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
14.93k (x3.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
15.47k (x4.12)
TOTAL
41.36k
112.85k (x2.73)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
526.44k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
420.48k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
196.13k (x4.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
17.68k (x1.04)
TOTAL
343.64k
1160.72k (x3.38)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4