| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 2.8 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
46.53k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
28.48k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
15.08k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
17.07k (x4.55)
TOTAL
41.36k
107.15k (x2.59)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
443.98k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
343.34k (x3.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
147.61k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
16.36k (x0.97)
TOTAL
343.64k
951.3k (x2.77)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4