Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06f5
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
135 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
47.14k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
25.77k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
13.25k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
14.77k (x3.94)
TOTAL
41.36k
100.94k (x2.44)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
168.51k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
142.8k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
63.57k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
15.34k (x0.91)
TOTAL
343.64k
390.23k (x1.14)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4