| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-1280P


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906a3
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
135 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
468.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
22.76k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
25.2k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
12.64k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
13.33k (x3.48)
TOTAL
33.68k
73.92k (x2.2)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
149.83k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
170.43k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
83.32k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
15.67k (x0.89)
TOTAL
277.66k
419.25k (x1.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
39.78k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
26.06k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.44k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
13.17k (x3.51)
TOTAL
41.36k
91.45k (x2.21)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
209.96k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
170.21k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
72.04k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
16.09k (x0.95)
TOTAL
343.64k
468.3k (x1.36)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4