| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-12500H


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906a3
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
225.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
21.11k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
19.61k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
9.53k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
7.72k (x2.01)
TOTAL
33.68k
57.97k (x1.72)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
61.44k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
93.66k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
40.09k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
6.01k (x0.34)
TOTAL
277.66k
201.2k (x0.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
22.61k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
17.73k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.63k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
8.4k (x2.24)
TOTAL
41.36k
58.37k (x1.41)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
85.49k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
94.93k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
39.15k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
6.08k (x0.36)
TOTAL
343.64k
225.65k (x0.66)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4