| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
90675
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
135 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
399.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
24.24k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
11.91k
24.74k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
13.95k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
14.47k (x3.77)
TOTAL
33.68k
77.41k (x2.3)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
105.42k
126.87k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
109.99k
186.48k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.56k
92.37k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.7k
15.45k (x0.87)
TOTAL
277.66k
421.18k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
33.85k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
20.33k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
10.51k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
11.77k (x3.14)
TOTAL
41.36k
76.46k (x1.85)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
174.21k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
141.31k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
64.86k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
19.01k (x1.12)
TOTAL
343.64k
399.39k (x1.16)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4