Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
90672
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
37.79k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
24.07k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.44k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
13.71k (x3.65)
TOTAL
41.36k
88.01k (x2.13)
Multithread
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
212.6k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
197.81k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
84.35k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
17.48k (x1.03)
TOTAL
343.64k
512.23k (x1.49)
Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4