Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i7-6600U
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
79.22k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
8.49k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
10.92k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
2.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
4.93k (x1.93)
TOTAL
19.48k
27.1k (x1.39)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
14.11k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
20.05k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
6.17k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
4.73k (x0.63)
TOTAL
459.31k
45.05k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
940 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
1337 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
411 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
3004 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
2497 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
3211 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
813 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
7970 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4