Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2 /4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
8.48k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
12.03k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
3.32k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.79k (x1.09)
TOTAL
19.48k
26.62k (x1.37)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
15.19k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
25.99k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
6.71k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
2.96k (x0.4)
TOTAL
459.31k
50.85k (x0.11)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4