Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i7-11700
Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i7-11700 gets 544.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i7-11700 gets 544.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10 /20
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
728.98k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
18.96k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
28.34k (x4.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
13.26k (x4.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
20.2k (x7.92)
TOTAL
19.48k
80.76k (x4.14)
Multithread
E5-2660 v2
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
164.31k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
253.96k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
115.28k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
10.65k (x1.43)
TOTAL
459.31k
544.2k (x1.18)
Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
2528 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
3907 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
1773 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
8372 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3869 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
5784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
2707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
16482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4