| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs W-2223


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
50657
Core
Broadwell-EP
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8448 kB
Date
March 2016
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.97k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
14.5k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.78k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
8.19k (x4.04)
TOTAL
14.79k
31.45k (x2.13)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
15.56k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
59.23k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
22.87k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
6.85k (x1.47)
TOTAL
123.78k
104.51k (x0.84)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
25.09k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
20.76k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.07k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
8.76k (x3.66)
TOTAL
29.39k
59.68k (x2.03)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
111.43k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
100.2k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
24.67k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
6.89k (x1.22)
TOTAL
237.83k
243.18k (x1.02)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4