Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs L5430
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 182.4 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
1067a
Core
Broadwell-EP
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
51.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
3.09k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
6.86k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
2.66k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
3.01k (x1.04)
TOTAL
27.18k
15.62k (x0.57)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
12.4k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
27.27k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
10.41k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
1.57k (x0.34)
TOTAL
182.37k
51.64k (x0.28)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
722 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1061 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
2146 points/W
1033 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
2739 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4021 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
963 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
9059 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4