Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
806e9
Core
Broadwell-EP
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
10.02k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
9.22k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
2.04k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
4.31k (x1.8)
TOTAL
29.39k
25.6k (x0.87)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
21.75k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
20.51k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
4.97k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
5.56k (x0.99)
TOTAL
237.83k
52.78k (x0.22)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4