| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i5-8400


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i5-8400 gets 289.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ea
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
64.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
289.61k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
4.08k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
14.96k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.98k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
10.29k (x5.08)
TOTAL
14.79k
34.31k (x2.32)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
21.54k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
85.13k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
28.24k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
4.08k (x0.88)
TOTAL
123.78k
139k (x1.12)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
26.5k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
23.11k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.2k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
10.16k (x4.24)
TOTAL
29.39k
64.98k (x2.21)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
135.08k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
121.49k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
27.53k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
5.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
237.83k
289.61k (x1.22)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1869 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
4455 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6626 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5778 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2541 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
16245 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4