Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a0652
Core
Broadwell-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
26.37k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
23.91k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.57k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
11.68k (x4.87)
TOTAL
29.39k
67.53k (x2.3)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
114.08k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
114.71k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
27.33k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
4.25k (x0.75)
TOTAL
237.83k
260.38k (x1.09)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4