Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 5800U
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a50f00
Core
Broadwell-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
314.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
18.34k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
22.78k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
9.45k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
20.59k (x8.59)
TOTAL
29.39k
71.16k (x2.42)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
102.74k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
143.27k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
58.13k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
10.41k (x1.84)
TOTAL
237.83k
314.55k (x1.32)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
20970 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4