Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
806c1
Core
Broadwell-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
210.4k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
4.26k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
19.54k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
10.95k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
11.08k (x5.47)
TOTAL
14.79k
45.84k (x3.1)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
15.69k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
68.3k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
33.66k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
12.16k (x2.62)
TOTAL
123.78k
129.81k (x1.05)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
14.48k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
24.18k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
11.95k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
11.01k (x3.81)
TOTAL
27.18k
61.62k (x2.27)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
50.98k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
80.7k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
36.61k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
12.02k (x2.6)
TOTAL
182.37k
180.32k (x0.99)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
16.27k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
25.74k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
11.5k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
10.82k (x4.5)
TOTAL
21.37k
64.32k (x3.01)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
54k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
88.76k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
35.23k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
12.14k (x2.23)
TOTAL
147.8k
190.12k (x1.29)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
22.97k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
21.61k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
8.99k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
8.52k (x3.56)
TOTAL
29.39k
62.1k (x2.11)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
82.75k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
86.58k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
29.34k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
11.72k (x2.08)
TOTAL
237.83k
210.4k (x0.88)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
7514 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4