Core E5-2620 v3 vs i3-7130U
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806e9
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
90.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
17.82k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
16.18k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.76k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
4.24k (x1.67)
TOTAL
35.86k
42k (x1.17)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
40.25k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
37.4k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
9.07k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
4.17k (x0.58)
TOTAL
357.99k
90.89k (x0.25)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
6059 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4