Core E5-2620 v3 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5800X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a20f12
Core
Haswell-EP
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
85 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
98304 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
631.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
22.59k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
24.32k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
11.32k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
24.86k (x9.79)
TOTAL
35.86k
83.1k (x2.32)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
181.41k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
236.12k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
105.13k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
108.48k (x15.03)
TOTAL
357.99k
631.14k (x1.76)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
6011 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4