Core E5-2620 v3 vs Ryzen 7 5700G
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a50f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
484.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
22.99k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
25.24k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
11.56k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
24.7k (x9.73)
TOTAL
35.86k
84.49k (x2.36)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
159.36k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
215.57k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
98.78k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
10.4k (x1.44)
TOTAL
357.99k
484.11k (x1.35)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
7448 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4