| | | | | | |

Core E5-2620 v3 vs i3-1220P


Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906a4
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
37.43k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
19.6k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
12.99k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
11.9k (x4.68)
TOTAL
35.86k
81.92k (x2.28)

Multithread

E5-2620 v3

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
178.85k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
153.82k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
69.38k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
2.69k (x0.37)
TOTAL
357.99k
404.74k (x1.13)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4