| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs E5-2670 v3


Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-1660 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
306f2
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
140 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
452.9k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
11.18k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
10.06k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
3.21k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.12k (x1.02)
TOTAL
37.6k
27.57k (x0.73)

Multithread

E5-1660 v4

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
140.98k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
145.37k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
45.62k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
6.75k (x0.34)
TOTAL
320.49k
338.73k (x1.06)

Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
1211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
3245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
1007 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
8894 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4