| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core i5-9500


Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i5-9500 gets 268.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ea
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
140 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
9216 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
352.84k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
16.14k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
24.18k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
5.87k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
12.5k (x4.07)
TOTAL
37.6k
58.69k (x1.56)

Multithread

E5-1660 v4

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
92.21k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
137.92k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
33.12k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
5.56k (x0.28)
TOTAL
320.49k
268.8k (x0.84)

Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
1419 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
509 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
4135 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
5495 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
13339 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4