Xeon E5-1660 v3 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306d4
Core
Haswell-EP
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /4
TDP
140 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
41.31k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.96k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-1660 v3
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.92k
13.58k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
12.14k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.67k
3.18k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
2.92k (x0.76)
TOTAL
41.31k
31.81k (x0.77)
Multithread
E5-1660 v3
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.59k
28.89k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
116.47k
28.74k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.79k
7.31k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.1k
3.74k (x0.22)
TOTAL
352.96k
68.69k (x0.19)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v3
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
832 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
2521 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v3
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5977 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3391 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1101 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
11802 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4