Xeon E5-1660 v3 vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-1660 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-1660 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a40f41
Core
Haswell-EP
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.31k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.96k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-1660 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.92k
21.04k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
22.41k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.67k
10.21k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
24.27k (x6.3)
TOTAL
41.31k
77.93k (x1.89)
Multithread
E5-1660 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.59k
158.65k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
116.47k
215.86k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.79k
89.45k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.1k
14.77k (x0.86)
TOTAL
352.96k
478.73k (x1.36)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
832 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
2521 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v3
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5977 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3391 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1101 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
11802 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4