| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1660 v3 vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-1660 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a50f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.31k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.96k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-1660 v3
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.92k
20.37k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
22.52k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.67k
10.18k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
21.49k (x5.57)
TOTAL
41.31k
74.56k (x1.8)

Multithread

E5-1660 v3

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.59k
144.01k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
116.47k
191.86k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.79k
84.53k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.1k
6.5k (x0.38)
TOTAL
352.96k
426.9k (x1.21)

Performance/W
E5-1660 v3
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
832 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
2521 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v3
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5977 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3391 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1101 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
11802 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4