Xeon E5-1660 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a50f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.31k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.96k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-1660 v3
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.92k
14.34k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
17.67k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.67k
6.41k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
14.95k (x3.88)
TOTAL
41.31k
53.37k (x1.29)
Multithread
E5-1660 v3
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.59k
83.58k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
116.47k
119.22k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.79k
48.56k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.1k
3.83k (x0.22)
TOTAL
352.96k
255.19k (x0.72)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v3
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
832 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
2521 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v3
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5977 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3391 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1101 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
11802 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4