Xeon E5-1660 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v3 gets a score of 353 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
140 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.31k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.96k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-1660 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.92k
11.13k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
19.38k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.67k
4.47k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.87k (x1)
TOTAL
41.31k
38.85k (x0.94)
Multithread
E5-1660 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.59k
17.13k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
116.47k
30.56k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.79k
9.44k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.1k
4.09k (x0.24)
TOTAL
352.96k
61.23k (x0.17)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
832 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
2521 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5977 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3391 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1101 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
11802 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4