Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-9750H gets 258.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-9750H gets 258.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906ed
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/12
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
276.46k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
16.31k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
24.48k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
13.02k (x2.68)
TOTAL
34.37k
59.67k (x1.74)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
87.54k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
131.05k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
28.47k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
11.8k (x0.97)
TOTAL
144.57k
258.87k (x1.79)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
1945 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
2912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
633 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
262 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
5753 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3624 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5439 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
2894 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
13261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4