Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i5-8265U gets 151.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i5-8265U gets 151.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
143.23k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
13.66k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
21.17k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
8.11k (x1.67)
TOTAL
34.37k
47.94k (x1.4)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
51.36k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
79.72k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
16.61k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
3.75k (x0.31)
TOTAL
144.57k
151.44k (x1.05)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
3424 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
5314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
10096 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
2081 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
12293 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4